ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
TeaNeRF: an integrated 3D visual perception pipeline for tea bud harvesting.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate perception of tea buds is a fundamental prerequisite for intelligent and precise tea harvesting planning. However, in real tea plantation environments, reliable harvesting-oriented perception at the planning level remains highly challenging due to the small size of tea buds, severe occlusion, complex background clutter, and the lack of accurate three-dimensional spatial information. To address these challenges, we propose TeaNeRF, an integrated three-dimensional visual perception pipeline designed for harvesting-oriented tea bud analysis. Instead of treating detection, segmentation, and spatial analysis as independent tasks, TeaNeRF integrates sequential two-dimensional recognition, monocular depth estimation, and neural radiance field reconstruction into a coherent perception pipeline, allowing accurate spatial understanding of tea buds in complex natural scenes. It should be noted that the proposed integration is conducted at the perception-output level, where multiple modular components are connected through fixed interfaces, rather than through joint optimization or an end-to-end trainable formulation. The proposed framework combines an enhanced YOLO-based detector, prompt-guided segmentation, and monocular depth priors to guide NeRF-based three-dimensional reconstruction. By incorporating depth supervision and semantic-aware neural fields, TeaNeRF generates dense and geometrically consistent point clouds with reliable semantic separation. Quantitative evaluations show consistent improvements in reconstruction fidelity, as reflected by increased PSNR and reduced LPIPS across multiple tea tree scenes. Based on the reconstructed semantic point cloud, a three-dimensional clustering and geometric fitting strategy is further developed to enable tea bud counting and harvesting-oriented candidate point estimation at the perception level. Experiments conducted on a real-world dataset of 4,700 tea plantation images demonstrate that TeaNeRF improves detection accuracy (mAP@50 = 91.7%), segmentation quality (IoU = 0.640), and overall three-dimensional perception performance. Case-level counting results on representative tea trees indicate that the proposed 3D semantic point cloud-based approach can provide feasible tea bud counting behavior and consistent spatial guidance cues for downstream harvesting planning. By providing structured three-dimensional spatial information, including tea bud locations, counts, and harvesting-oriented candidate points, TeaNeRF offers practical perception-level outputs for downstream planning in automated tea harvesting systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.