ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2026
Social learning and exploration-exploitation dilemma in decision-making.
Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This mini review examines the neurocomputational principles of social learning through the lens of the exploration-exploitation dilemma. While the neural mechanisms of learning from others-mediated by distinct signals in the ventromedial and lateral prefrontal cortices-are well established, less is known about how these mechanisms interact with the fundamental trade-off between gathering information ("exploration") and maximizing rewards ("exploitation"). We discuss how social environments shape this trade-off, leading to strategic behaviors such as informational free-riding or conformity. A central focus of this review is the issue of source selection: how agents decide whom to observe. We present recent evidence suggesting that, contrary to the predictions of optimal information-seeking theories, humans often exhibit a "reliability-seeking" bias, preferring to learn from consistent, exploitation-oriented partners rather than highly exploratory ones. We conclude by discussing the limitations of current paradigms, specifically the inherent confounding of social cues such as competence and predictability, and outline a computational framework for isolating the specific drivers of adaptive social decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.