Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41846589›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2026

Social learning and exploration-exploitation dilemma in decision-making.

Gota Morishita, Shinsuke Suzuki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gota MorishitaCentre for Brain, Mind and Markets, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Shinsuke SuzukiCentre for Brain, Mind and Markets, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This mini review examines the neurocomputational principles of social learning through the lens of the exploration-exploitation dilemma. While the neural mechanisms of learning from others-mediated by distinct signals in the ventromedial and lateral prefrontal cortices-are well established, less is known about how these mechanisms interact with the fundamental trade-off between gathering information ("exploration") and maximizing rewards ("exploitation"). We discuss how social environments shape this trade-off, leading to strategic behaviors such as informational free-riding or conformity. A central focus of this review is the issue of source selection: how agents decide whom to observe. We present recent evidence suggesting that, contrary to the predictions of optimal information-seeking theories, humans often exhibit a "reliability-seeking" bias, preferring to learn from consistent, exploitation-oriented partners rather than highly exploratory ones. We conclude by discussing the limitations of current paradigms, specifically the inherent confounding of social cues such as competence and predictability, and outline a computational framework for isolating the specific drivers of adaptive social decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSocial BehaviorSocial LearningAnimalsHumansRewardcomputational modeldecision-makingimitationobservational learningreinforcement learningrewardsocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID41846589
PMCPMC12989571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.