ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2026
Predicting Risk of Plasmodium Vivax Microscopy-Detected Episodes Using Serological Markers in Patients With Plasmodium falciparum Malaria: A Multicountry Diagnostic Performance Evaluation.
Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03916003 (Reducing the Risk of P. Vivax After Falciparum Infections in Co-endemic Areas - a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Reducing the Risk of P. Vivax After Falciparum Infections in Co-endemic Areas - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlasmodium vivax presents a significant obstacle to malaria elimination due to its capacity to form dormant liver-stage hypnozoites that can cause relapses. Universal radical cure, which administers hypnozoite-targeting treatment to patients with P. falciparum malaria living in co-endemic areas, has potential to reduce P. vivax relapses. However, its implementation is hindered by the lack of a diagnostic tool for detecting hypnozoite-carriage.
methodsP. vivax serological exposure markers (SEMs) were evaluated as a screening tool in P. falciparum patients for predicting risk of P. vivax microscopy-detected episodes over the following 63 days. Analysis was performed using samples from participants in the PRIMA study from Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Bangladesh (NCT03916003). An existing random forest serological classification algorithm was used and evaluated for sensitivity and specificity, then further optimized by re-training a study-specific model.
resultsIgG antibodies were measured in 244 P. falciparum participant samples, of which 22 had a vivax microscopy-detected episode during follow-up. Serological exposure markers showed high sensitivity (82%) but low specificity (27%), likely due to sustained antibody responses in moderate-to-high transmission areas or undetected submicroscopic P. vivax infections during follow-up. A study-specific algorithm increased specificity to 68%, but with a corresponding drop in sensitivity to 68%.
conclusionsAlthough P. vivax SEMs showed limited suitability for guiding radical cure in P. falciparum patients in this study (where the outcome was microscopy-detected vivax episodes), they could play a valuable role in building community trust and acceptance of universal radical cure when supported by strong communication and implementation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.