ArticleDrug and alcohol review2026
Concerns and Experiences of Alcohol and Other Drug Healthcare Staff Regarding Intoxication Detection and Driving Safety of Opioid Treatment Clients.
Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAccurate detection and management of intoxication is critical in healthcare, particularly in alcohol and other drug (AOD) settings. While alcohol intoxication is often reliably assessed, drug intoxication is harder to detect. For clients receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT), intoxication status can impact safety, treatment planning and driving eligibility. This study explores AOD healthcare staff confidence, training and concerns in managing intoxication and driving safety amongst OAT clients.
methodA cross-sectional survey was conducted with staff across 12 public AOD clinics in New South Wales, Australia. Data were collected on self-reported confidence and training regarding client intoxication and driving safety, concerns and experiences managing intoxicated OAT clients, and substances of concern for intoxication and driving safety.
resultsSeventy-nine staff (58% nursing, 19% allied health, 17% medical, 6% other) completed the survey, with a median of 7 years' AOD experience. Two-thirds reported confidence managing intoxicated OAT clients, and 87% felt adequately trained. Key barriers to managing suspected intoxication included risk of aggression (72%), concern about upsetting clients (44%), and risk of incorrect assessment (38%). Half of staff (55%) reported encountering an intoxicated client in the past year. Substances of greatest concern for client intoxication and driving safety were benzodiazepines (95%), heroin (94%), alcohol (92%) and amphetamines (87%). DISCUSSIONS AND
conclusionsWhile many AOD staff feel relatively confident identifying and managing client intoxication, they reported concerns around managing such scenarios. Ongoing training, alongside tools or structured frameworks, may support healthcare staff to better detect and manage intoxication and driving safety of clients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.