ArticleAsian journal of andrology2026
Evaluating patient experience with in-person versus virtual vasectomy consultations.
Article in Asian journal of andrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there has been a rise in the use of telehealth pre-vasectomy consultations. Several studies have demonstrated that the rates of vasectomy completion do not seem to be affected by consultation type, suggesting that a pre-vasectomy physical examination is not necessary for successful procedure completion. While the current research offers a preliminary evaluation of the feasibility of virtual consultations for vasectomy, it has not included patient experiences with the consultation and the procedure. Thus, we evaluated satisfaction, procedural experience, and consultation preferences among patients undergoing vasectomy after either in-person or virtual consultation. Between October 1, 2022 and December 31, 2023, patients scheduled with two fellowship-trained infertility specialists were offered either visit type, with consistent counseling and appointment availability across modalities. Post-procedure surveys assessed satisfaction, pain, consultation preference, and anxiolytic use. Of 169 survey respondents, 40 (23.7%) had virtual and 129 (76.3%) had in-person consultations. Five (4.4%) patients who had an in-person consultation reported they would have preferred to have a virtual consultation. In the virtual cohort, 3 (8.6%) patients would have preferred an in-person consultation. No statistical difference was observed between the groups regarding preference for alternate consultation type ( P = 0.39). There were also no significant differences in pain rating or reported comfort with vas manipulation by consultation modality ( P = 0.21 and P = 0.17, respectively). Most patients still choose in-person consultations over virtual consultations for vasectomy despite equal availability to both, and patients report similar satisfaction and pain scores regardless of their consultation method. Virtual consultation can be offered without compromising patient experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.