ArticleThe New phytologist2026
Benzoxazinoid-mediated microbiome feedbacks enhance Arabidopsis growth and defence.
Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Metabolite-mediated plant immunity: From traditional defenders to artificial elicitors.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plants modulate their surrounding microbiome via root exudates and such conditioned soil microbiomes feed back on the performance of the next generation of plants. How plants perceive altered soil microbiomes and modulate their performance in response to such microbiome feedbacks, however, remains largely unknown. As tool to condition contrasting microbiomes in soil, we made use of two maize lines, which differ in their ability to exude benzoxazinoids (BXs). Based on these differentially conditioned soil microbiomes we have established a model system with Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) to investigate the mechanisms of microbiome feedbacks. Arabidopsis plants responding to the BX-conditioned soil microbiome grew better and were developmentally more advanced. Further, these plants harboured differential root bacterial communities, showed enhanced defence signatures in transcriptomes of their shoots, and they were more resistant to the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Intriguingly, Arabidopsis responded with both improved growth and enhanced defence to the BX-conditioned soil microbiome, and we found that this simultaneous increase of growth and defence was mediated by priming of the defences. Further advancing our basic understanding of how plants respond to soil microbiomes and mediate their feedbacks is particularly important for the goal to improve crops so they can benefit from their soil microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.