ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026
In vitro and in vivo metabolism profiles of cathinone and pseudoephedrine: Discrimination between khat and pseudoephedrine uses.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In vitro and in vivo metabolism profiles of cathinone and pseudoephedrine: Discrimination between khat and pseudoephedrine uses.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the present study, the metabolism of khat (Catha edulis) and pseudoephedrine was compared with the aim of identifying objective criteria that could be used to discriminate between them for forensic and doping-control purposes. An in vitro study using human liver microsomes and an in vivo study using rat urine were performed under harmonized experimental conditions. Biological samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and the resulting metabolism profiles were qualitatively and semi-quantitatively compared. Several metabolites of khat (or cathinone) and pseudoephedrine were common in both models, confirming that cathine alone cannot serve as a specific marker of khat use. Cathinone was also detected in pseudoephedrine-treated rat urine, although only at very low concentrations, while the unchanged parent compound remained the predominant urinary species in both dosing conditions. Thus, these findings indicate that interpretation must rely on the overall parent-metabolite pattern and support the use of urinary pseudoephedrine-to-cathinone concentration ratios as tentative criteria to discriminate between khat and pseudoephedrine use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.