ArticlePorcine health management2026
Characterising responses in group-housed pigs to Salmonella typhimurium infection through integrated computer vision-based behavioural monitoring and statistical analyses.
Article in Porcine health management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth monitoring is crucial for early disease detection and prompt intervention to mitigate the disease. Computer vision is one of the novel methods for disease detection, but a significant gap remains in its application for detecting behavioural deviations associated with disease. This study employed YOLOv8s-based behavioural monitoring combined with statistical analysis to evaluate disease detection efficacy in group-housed pigs. Two groups of pigs (Control [CON] and Treatment [TRT]), 9-10 weeks old of a (Large White × Landrace) × Duroc cross, were raised for 21 days. The growing period was divided into three periods (adaptation, challenge, and recovery) and evaluated based on growth performance, health indicators (ear base temperature and faecal score), and behaviour (postures, feeding, and drinking). The TRT group was challenged with Salmonella typhimurium during the challenge period to induce infection, then treated with antibiotics. Two pre-trained YOLOv8s models were employed to quantify postures (Lateral Lying, Sternal Lying, Standing, and Sitting) and nutritive behaviours (Feeding and Drinking). Z-score analyses based on daily data (DZA) and time-specific or 12-h interval (TSZA) data were used to detect behavioural anomalies, with the adaptation period as the baseline.
resultsDuring the challenge period, TRT pigs exhibited a drastic decline in growth, increased ear base temperature, and elevated faecal scores, confirming successful infection. Compensatory growth was observed during the recovery period. Automated behaviour monitoring enabled detailed temporal analysis of responses to infection, treatment, and environmental fluctuations. Notable behavioural deviations in the TRT group emerged at 4 days post-inoculation (DPI), aligning with significant health deterioration. However, health indicators diverged as early as 1 DPI, suggesting that group-based behavioural monitoring may be less sensitive to early individual responses. TSZA detected subtle behavioural anomalies earlier than DZA, with disruptions in the TRT group beginning at 0 DPI. These included sharp fluctuations in sitting, lying, and feeding behaviours, which gradually stabilised after treatment.
conclusionsThis study highlights the potential of computer vision-based behavioural monitoring as a non-invasive, high-throughput tool for real-time health surveillance. While effective for group assessments, results emphasise the need for more advanced methods to enhance early disease detection and improve precision in pig health management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.