ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Impact of diagnostic genetic testing for familial dementia: experiences of patients and relatives.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile memory clinic patients express interest in diagnostic genetic testing for monogenic causes of dementia, its personal consequences remain unclear. We explored the psychosocial and behavioral impact on patients and relatives.
methodsIn this mixed-methods study, we examined 31 patients meeting eligibility criteria for genetic testing as part of their diagnostic work-up at Alzheimer Center Amsterdam. Patients were 45% female, and aged 61 ± 8 (MMSE = 23 ± 5, 25 dementia [15 AD, 4 PPA, 6 other], 1 MCI, 1 SCD, 4 other/undetermined). Twenty-five tested negative, and six positive. Per case, either the patient, one or more relatives, or both were included (3/31 patient only; 5/31 relative(s) only; 23/31 both), yielding 26 patients and 29 relatives (55% female, and aged 54 ± 12). Participants completed questionnaires assessing psychosocial and behavioral factors at first visit, one week post-counseling, and one week and three months post-disclosure. We used linear mixed models to calculate effects of group, time, and interaction, with patients and relatives analyzed separately. In addition, 8 patients and 10 relatives participated in 13 semi-structured interviews, analyzed inductively.
resultsAverage anxiety, depression and distress levels remained below clinical threshold in patients and relatives. Anxiety was lower in patients one week and three months post-disclosure, and lower in relatives one week post-disclosure. At baseline, positive patients reported lower social support, and over time they discussed genetic testing less often with others. Positive patients more often reported having registered for research participation. Patients’ decision regret was low and independent of group. Interviews revealed that participants receiving negative results felt relieved their offspring were not at genetic risk, but some remained uncertain about the cause of their disease. Those receiving positive results experienced emotional distress about potential implications for their children, yet appreciated having clarity. Participants related to positive cases described challenges in receiving emotional support.
conclusionsWhile diagnostic genetic testing was well tolerated and valued, it also revealed complex emotional, relational, and practical consequences for patients and families, indicating a need for psychosocial support. As this was an exploratory study, findings should be interpreted cautiously and validated in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.