ArticleBMC psychology2026
Unveiling the nature and attributes of self-forgiveness in young Indian adults: insights from thematic analysis.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough interpersonal forgiveness is well studied, there is little research on self-forgiveness. The available research on self-forgiveness is mostly based on interpersonal forgiveness. This study attempts to understand the nature, attributes and dynamics of self-forgiveness.
methodsThe data were collected from 25 adults (aged 18–25 years) enrolled in higher education through a semistructured interview and were thematically analysed.
resultsThe analysis resulted in six themes illustrating how participants understood self-forgiveness. Theme 1 emphasizes early offense realization, reduced anger, and facing consequences, often leading to guilt influenced by moral upbringing. Theme 2 addresses mental and physical discomfort, including rumination and poor concentration. Theme 3 discusses alleviating negative feelings through future actions and viewing mistakes as growth lessons. Theme 4 highlights the importance of relationships with victims, where perceived forgiveness and reconciliation are crucial. Theme 5 describes participants’ beliefs that engaging in positive behaviours towards victims aids self-forgiveness, influenced by the severity of the transgression. Theme 6 describes how the participants’ answers might suggest that traits such as responsibility, empathy, humility, and positive values may facilitate self-forgiveness by promoting self-compassion and accountability.
conclusionsParticipants’ descriptions suggested that self-forgiveness is a multifaceted process that might have significant implications for health, well-being and relationships. We suggest that self-forgiveness may be initiated by encouraging individuals to acknowledge and take responsibility for their actions, which in turn may promote self-reflection and accountability. Helping individuals to manage emotions such as anger and guilt may be effective in preventing them from obstructing the self-forgiveness process. Facilitating reconciliation with those harmed and seeking forgiveness from victims can significantly enhance self-forgiveness. Strengthening responsibility, empathy, humility, and positive values might facilitate self-forgiveness by promoting self-compassion and accountability. We propose the Realization-Distress-Reparation-Reconciliation model, a new model of self-forgiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.