Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41845463›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026

Systematic evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of PFNA, PFBN, and InterTan fixation for intertrochanteric fractures under gradient variations of proximal femoral lateral wall thickness and delineation of optimal fixation domains.

Deyan Ou, Zhizuo Chen, Mengyao Jiang, Lican Chen, Youbin Chen, Shixin Pan, Jianwen Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deyan Ou *Trauma Orthopedics Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Province, China.
Zhizuo Chen *Trauma Orthopedics Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Province, China.
Mengyao Jiang *Department of Limb and Joint Ward, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi Province, China.
Lican ChenDepartment of Limb and Joint Ward, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi Province, China.
Youbin ChenDepartment of Limb and Joint Ward, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi Province, China.
Shixin PanDepartment of Spine Ward, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi Province, China. honghuixmf@outlook.com.
Jianwen ChengTrauma Orthopedics Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Province, China. 1730054162@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe proximal femoral lateral wall serves as a critical "lateral pillar" in the mechanical stability of intertrochanteric fractures, and variations in its thickness may profoundly influence the biomechanical behavior of different intramedullary fixation systems. However, previous studies have largely assessed the lateral wall in a binary manner, lacking systematic evidence based on continuous gradients. This study aimed to elucidate the biomechanical coupling between lateral wall thickness and three mainstream intramedullary fixation systems (PFNA, PFBN, and InterTan) using high-resolution finite element models, and to delineate the optimal lateral wall domains for each system.

methodsSixteen continuous gradient models of the lateral wall, ranging from + 35 mm to - 20 mm, were constructed and implanted with PFNA, PFBN, or InterTan. Under three typical loading conditions-standing, slow walking, and fast walking-the maximum equivalent stress of the lag screw/main nail, overall displacement fields, and the mechanical response trajectories and instability trends of each fixation system during lateral wall thinning were analyzed and compared.

resultsLateral wall thickness significantly affected the overall mechanical stability of intertrochanteric fractures. With progressive thinning, all three fixation systems exhibited increasing stress concentration and displacement. This relationship was nonlinear, with accelerated deterioration observed once the lateral wall was reduced below specific thresholds. Among the devices, PFBN maintained more uniform load distribution across the full gradient range, sustaining relatively low implant stress and minimal fracture gap displacement even with weak or absent lateral walls. InterTan demonstrated intermediate stability between PFBN and PFNA, with stress and displacement changes occurring more gradually during wall thinning. In contrast, PFNA was more sensitive to lateral wall deficiency, showing pronounced displacement increases under extremely thin wall conditions.

conclusionFinite element analysis indicates that lateral wall thickness is a decisive factor for the fixation stability of intertrochanteric fractures. Progressive thinning leads to marked increases in stress and displacement for all intramedullary devices, accompanied by characteristic mechanical critical points. PFBN provides superior stability under weak or absent lateral wall conditions, whereas PFNA and InterTan are more sensitive to lateral wall structural variations. These findings suggest that lateral wall thickness should be a core parameter in selecting fixation methods and formulating postoperative weight-bearing strategies, providing critical biomechanical evidence for individualized management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

Indexed as

FemurFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHip FracturesBiomechanical PhenomenaBone NailsBone ScrewsFinite Element AnalysisHumansProximal Femoral FracturesBiomechanical stabilityIntertrochanteric fractureIntramedullary fixationLateral wall thickness

Identifiers

PMID41845463
PMCPMC13262480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.