ArticleFrontiers in zoology2026
Earlier hatching date rather than chick phenotypic quality enhances first-year survival in the black-headed gull.
Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFavourable conditions experienced during early ontogeny are expected to positively influence individual performance at later stages of the life cycle and determine lifetime fitness. In this study, we investigated whether early-life (chick) phenotypic quality (body condition and immunocompetence) and hatching date are associated with post-fledging survival in the black-headed gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus. To this end, we quantified size-corrected body mass, total blood haemoglobin concentration, and PHA-induced immune response in more than 500 colour-marked gull chicks in Poland. We then analysed their first-year survival rates using capture-recapture models based on extensive resighting data collected across Europe.
resultsNeither better body condition (body mass and haemoglobin concentration) nor higher immunocompetence during rearing significantly improved post-fledging (first year of life) survival rate. In contrast, post-fledging survival was primarily determined by hatching date, as early-hatched chicks showed enhanced survival rates than those hatched late in the season. The positive effect of early hatching on post-fledging survival was apparent despite lower phenotypic quality of those early-hatched chicks.
conclusionsOur study identifies hatching date as the key determinant of post-fledging survival in the black-headed gull. We suggest that the cumulative negative effects of delayed (suboptimal) hatching and fledging in black-headed gulls may outweigh any benefits of elevated condition and immunocompetence at the natal stage, ultimately compromising post-fledging survival. We propose that our findings may be explained by varying levels of temporal (mis)synchronization between peak food availability and key stages of the annual cycle, particularly the early post-fledging period. The study adds to the understanding of the carry-over effects between the successive stages of the life cycle in wild colonial birds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.