ArticleHead & face medicine2026
CBCT-based virtual surgical planning for predicting risk factors and preventive strategies of buccal plate perforation in maxillary premolar implant placement.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBuccal plate perforation (BPP) is a common intraoperative complication during implant placement in the maxillary premolar region, compromising implant stability and long-term success. This study aimed to identify CBCT-based risk factors for BPP and develop a predictive model to optimize implant planning. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans from 252 patients with missing maxillary premolars was performed. Virtual implant simulation evaluated the effects of alveolar bone type, alveolar bone inclination angle (ABIA), tooth position, and implant-to-bone angulation (IBA) on BPP incidence. Significant variables identified by Chi-squared and t-tests were further analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine predictive thresholds.
resultsSex, tooth position, alveolar bone type, ABIA, and IBA were significantly associated with BPP (P < 0.05). Female patients, first premolar sites, and buccally projected-concave bone types showed higher risk. BPP risk increased when ABIA ≥ 24.94° or IBA ≥ 20.71°, whereas a 1 mm palatal shift from the alveolar ridge center reduced its incidence from 34.69% to 7.1% with minimal palatal perforation (2.6%).
conclusionsCBCT-based virtual planning enables individualized risk assessment and optimization of implant trajectory. This study identifies key quantitative thresholds for ABIA and IBA, which, when combined with minor adjustments in implant positioning, provide a robust strategy for improving surgical outcomes. Although these findings are derived from virtual simulations, clinical validation is required to confirm their applicability in real-world clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.