ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Operating room performance metrics of anesthesia and surgery duration: a descriptive analysis of emergency surgical cases.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficient operating room (OR) time management is critical for healthcare quality, yet the precise relationships among key OR metrics remain underexplored. This study analyzed data from 3,423 patients treated in a Medical Center’s operating rooms between 2020 and 2022. Key time efficiency metrics of operating rooms included the surgery-to-anesthesia duration ratio and the operation preparation-to-surgery duration ratio. Analysis revealed a weak correlation (r = 0.10) between two performance metrics: the discrepancy between surgery and anesthesia duration, and the discrepancy between surgical preparation and actual surgery time. Significant differences were observed across anesthesia duration, surgery duration, and preparation duration when comparing cesarean sections to the overall sample. For cesarean sections specifically, the surgery-to-anesthesia duration ratio was significantly lower under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (0.60) than under epidural anesthesia alone (0.65). Additionally, when comparing surgical levels II and III for cesarean sections by anesthesia method, significant differences emerged in both anesthesia and surgery durations. Operating room management should leverage these insights to optimize anesthesia protocols and surgical workflows, potentially reducing costly delays and improving patient throughput without compromising care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.