Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41845424›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026

Diagnostic performance of plasma GFAP in preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease using the Lumipulse platform.

Andrea Valera-Barrero, Francisco Martínez-Dubarbie, Armando Guerra, Sara López-García, Carmen Lage, María Rivera-Sánchez, Ana Pozueta-Cantudo, María García-Martínez, Andrea Corrales-Pardo, María Bravo and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Andrea Valera-BarreroNeurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain. andreavalerabarrero@gmail.com.
Francisco Martínez-DubarbieNeurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain.
Armando GuerraBiochemistry and Clinical Analysis Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain.
Sara López-GarcíaNeurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain.
Carmen LageNeurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain.
María Rivera-SánchezNeurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain.
Ana Pozueta-CantudoNeurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain.
María García-MartínezNeurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain.
Andrea Corrales-PardoNeurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain.
María BravoNeurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain.
Marcos López-HoyosInstitute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain.
Juan Irure-VenturaInstitute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain.
Heidy Cahuana-SantamaríaBiochemistry and Clinical Analysis Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain.
María Teresa García-UnzuetaInstitute for Research Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, 39011, Spain.
Guglielmo Di MolfettaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden.
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden.
Nicholas J AshtonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden.
Pascual Sánchez-JuanNetwork Center for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, CIBERNED, National Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, 28220, Spain.
Eloy Rodríguez-Rodríguez *Neurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain.
Marta Fernández-Matarrubia *Neurology Service, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Avda. de Valdecilla 25, Santander, Cantabria, 39008, Spain. marta.fernandez3@scsalud.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) has emerged as a promising biomarker of astrocytic reactivity in preclinical Alzheimer´s Disease (AD). However, most evidence to date comes from ultrasensitive research assays, with limited data from automated clinical platforms. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of plasma GFAP in cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals using the fully automated Lumipulse platform, and to assess its concordance with a highly sensitive research-based immunoassay, Single Molecule Array (SIMOA).

methodsPlasma GFAP, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-β (Aβ)42/40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 181, total tau (t-tau), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) were analyzed in 204 CU participants using the Lumipulse G600II platform. In a subset of 143 individuals, it was also measured with SIMOA. We examined correlations between plasma GFAP and CSF biomarkers, after adjusting for age, sex, and ApoE ε4, and compared plasma GFAP concentrations across AT groups. The ability of plasma GFAP to discriminate amyloid status was assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses. Agreement between Lumipulse and SIMOA techniques was evaluated using Passing–Bablok regression and Bland–Altman analysis.

resultsPlasma GFAP significantly correlated with Aβ42 (r= -0.24; p-value < 0.001) and Aβ42/Aβ40 (Rho= -0.24; p-value < 0.001). Plasma GFAP concentrations were higher in A+ compared with A− subjects (64.7 vs. 47.6 pg/mL; p = 0.001) and in T+ compared with T− individuals (64.3 vs. 48.5 pg/mL; p = 0.005). A + T+ subjects showed higher plasma GFAP levels than A-T- subjects difference = 22.2 pg/mL; p < 0.0001; Cohen’s d = 0.81), and this difference remained significant after adjustment for covariates (estimate = 14.5 pg/mL; p = 0.005). Plasma GFAP discriminated amyloid status (A + vs. A- individuals) with an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.59–0.76). Lumipulse and SIMOA measurements showed a strong correlation (r = 0.96; p < 0.001), and good agreement (97% within Bland–Altman limits; slight proportional bias in Passing–Bablok regression).

conclusionPlasma GFAP measured with the fully automated Lumipulse platform is a reliable and accessible tool for assessing astrocyte activation in preclinical AD. Although its individual diagnostic performance is moderate for detecting amyloid pathology in CU individuals, its relationship with CSF biomarkers and concordance with SIMOA support its clinical utility. When combined with other biomarkers, plasma GFAP could enhance early detection and improve participant selection in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinAgedAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurofilament ProteinsPeptide FragmentsROC Curvetau ProteinsAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-40)amyloid beta-protein (1-42)BiomarkersGFAP protein, humanGlial Fibrillary Acidic Proteinneurofilament protein LNeurofilament ProteinsPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsAstrocyte activationEarly diagnosisGlial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)LumipulseMicrogliaPlasma biomarkersPreclinical Alzheimer’s disease

Identifiers

PMID41845424
PMCPMC13112679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.