ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Diagnostic performance of plasma GFAP in preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease using the Lumipulse platform.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translating blood-based biomarkers into Alzheimer's disease clinical practice: screening, diagnosis, and longitudinal monitoring.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) has emerged as a promising biomarker of astrocytic reactivity in preclinical Alzheimer´s Disease (AD). However, most evidence to date comes from ultrasensitive research assays, with limited data from automated clinical platforms. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of plasma GFAP in cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals using the fully automated Lumipulse platform, and to assess its concordance with a highly sensitive research-based immunoassay, Single Molecule Array (SIMOA).
methodsPlasma GFAP, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-β (Aβ)42/40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 181, total tau (t-tau), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) were analyzed in 204 CU participants using the Lumipulse G600II platform. In a subset of 143 individuals, it was also measured with SIMOA. We examined correlations between plasma GFAP and CSF biomarkers, after adjusting for age, sex, and ApoE ε4, and compared plasma GFAP concentrations across AT groups. The ability of plasma GFAP to discriminate amyloid status was assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses. Agreement between Lumipulse and SIMOA techniques was evaluated using Passing–Bablok regression and Bland–Altman analysis.
resultsPlasma GFAP significantly correlated with Aβ42 (r= -0.24; p-value < 0.001) and Aβ42/Aβ40 (Rho= -0.24; p-value < 0.001). Plasma GFAP concentrations were higher in A+ compared with A− subjects (64.7 vs. 47.6 pg/mL; p = 0.001) and in T+ compared with T− individuals (64.3 vs. 48.5 pg/mL; p = 0.005). A + T+ subjects showed higher plasma GFAP levels than A-T- subjects difference = 22.2 pg/mL; p < 0.0001; Cohen’s d = 0.81), and this difference remained significant after adjustment for covariates (estimate = 14.5 pg/mL; p = 0.005). Plasma GFAP discriminated amyloid status (A + vs. A- individuals) with an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.59–0.76). Lumipulse and SIMOA measurements showed a strong correlation (r = 0.96; p < 0.001), and good agreement (97% within Bland–Altman limits; slight proportional bias in Passing–Bablok regression).
conclusionPlasma GFAP measured with the fully automated Lumipulse platform is a reliable and accessible tool for assessing astrocyte activation in preclinical AD. Although its individual diagnostic performance is moderate for detecting amyloid pathology in CU individuals, its relationship with CSF biomarkers and concordance with SIMOA support its clinical utility. When combined with other biomarkers, plasma GFAP could enhance early detection and improve participant selection in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.