ArticleBMC biotechnology2026
Sustainable utilization of phosphogypsum in agriculture enhanced by mycorrhizal organisms: a new perspective.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe extensive stockpiling of phosphogypsum(PG) poses significant environmental challenges, while many agricultural soils in Yunnan Province exhibit sulfur deficiency and low phosphorus availability. Incorporating exogenous nutrients and bio-fertilizers represents a promising strategy to address both issues. Although PG contains valuable nutrients such as phosphorus (P) and sulfur (S) that can support crop growth, its arsenic (As) content may bright pollution risk to crop growth. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are known to promote plant growth and nutrients absorption, and alleviate arsenic stress from soil. This study investigated the synergy effects of AMF inoculation and PG amendment on tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) growth, nutrient uptake, and As accumulation.
resultsThe results show that both FM and GA inoculation increased shoot and root biomass of the three tobacco varieties. PG addition significantly increased the plant S concentration, total uptake, and specific absorption rate in ‘KRK26’ plants. Under both FM and the GA inoculation, PG addition significantly increased the plant P concentration and absorbed amount as well as the uptake ratio of P to As in ‘KRK26’ shoots. FM inoculation increased P, S concentration as well as total uptake amount, and the specific absorption rate in all tobacco varieties at each PG treatment level, while reducing As concentration and absorption in ‘YY87’ by up to 22.96% and 20.21%, respectively. GA inoculation significantly increased P concentration, uptake amount, and P specific absorption rate in ‘KRK26’ by 110.61%, 122.39%, and 179.04%, respectively. Moreover, GA inoculation significantly decreased the shoot As concentration and uptake, thereby increasing the uptake ratio of P to As in both ‘NC297’ and ‘KRK26’ plants. Principal component and correlation analyses identified that P and As showed a co-directional change in the absorption process. As absorption was positively correlated with S availability. Soil pH was negatively correlated with plant P uptake(r=-0.50, P < 0.05), S uptake(r=-0.43), As uptake(r=-0.38), soil available P(r=-0.48, P < 0.05) and available S content(r=-0.54, P < 0.05).
conclusionThe combined application of PG and AMF (Especially for GA) can promote the absorption of P and S by tobacco to a certain extent and inhibit the accumulation of As, with the most pronounced effects observed in the ‘KRK26’ variety. Soil pH plays a key role in element bioavailability, and further analysis confirms a synergistic interaction among P, S, and As during plant uptake. These findings provide a reliable practical solution for the safe and sustainable use of PG in agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.