ArticleBMC urology2026
Bridging the gap in PCNL preoperative planning: software-free stone metrics that outperform conventional measures.
Article in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAccurate preoperative stone size assessment is crucial for predicting outcomes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), yet a gap persists between the accurate but impractical gold standard (3D software volume) and the practical but suboptimal conventional metrics (maximum diameter and cross-sectional area). This study aimed to validate two novel, software-free stone size metrics—the triaxial diametric product (X) and stacked volume (V)—designed for routine clinical computed tomography (CT) and compare their efficacy in predicting the stone-free rate (SFR) against conventional methods.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 283 patients who underwent PCNL. Stone size was measured using four metrics on pre-operative non-contrast CT: maximum diameter (R), maximum cross-sectional area (S), triaxial diametric product (X = x·y·z), and stacked volume (V). The predictive power for SFR was evaluated and compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and DeLong’s test.
resultsAll four metrics were significant predictors of SFR (p < 0.001). The predictive accuracy, ranked by the area under the curve (AUC), was as follows: maximum diameter (R, AUC = 0.703) < maximum cross-sectional area (S, AUC = 0.734) < triaxial diametric product (X, AUC = 0.789) < stacked volume (V, AUC = 0.801). The novel metrics X and V both significantly outperformed the conventional metrics R and S (p < 0.01), with no significant difference between X and V.
conclusionThe triaxial diametric product (X) is recommended as a practical and more accurate alternative to conventional metrics for routine clinical practice, especially for stones > 1.5 cm, as it offers an improved balance of predictive accuracy, straightforward calculation, and easy integration into existing workflows without needing specialized software or additional costs. The stacked volume (V) serves as a feasible, software-free tool for practical size estimation in research settings. This study provides urologists with immediately applicable tools to enhance preoperative planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.