ArticleBMC medical education2026
An evaluation of the undergraduate medicine licensure examinations development and implementation practices: lessons from Ethiopia with global implications.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe development of undergraduate medicine licensure examinations is critical for ensuring physicians’ competencies. Existing literature primarily focuses on exams Psychometric properties while leaving a gap in understanding the developmental processes, stakeholder engagement, and contextual influences, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study evaluated the mechanisms and stakeholders’ perspectives on shaping the Ethiopian undergraduate medicine licensure examination development and implementation practices.
methodsA qualitative study design combining a phenomenological orientation with a realistic evaluation approach was employed. Purposive sampling was used to select eight experienced experts from four major stakeholder institutions. Data were collected through key informant interviews and cross-validated against exam development guidelines and expert profile datasets. Thematic analysis was conducted to present challenges, enablers, and institutional factors.
resultsThe study evidenced that the Ethiopian Undergraduate Medicine Licensure Examination follows a standard approach, consisting of task analysis, blueprint preparation, item construction and appraisal, and exam administration. However, critical gaps were identified in expertise psychometric competencies, and challenges associated with paper-based testing and exam security concerns.
conclusionWhile participants perceive the undergraduate medicine licensure examination design aligned with national goals, its implementation is compromised by technical and logistic gaps. Transitioning to Computer-Based Testing, professionalizing item writing, and balancing stakeholder representation with experienced experts are essential facets to maintain the exam’s validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.