ArticleReproductive health2026
Abortion policy, political control, and maternal and infant mortality in the United States: a cross-sectional ecological study.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal and infant mortality in the U.S. remain the highest among high-income nations, with disparities worsening after Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. This study examined how abortion bans and partisan political control are associated with maternal and infant mortality, while accounting for sociodemographic, economic, and healthcare factors.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional ecological study of all 50 U.S. states, linking maternal mortality ratios (MMR) and infant mortality rates (IMR) with abortion policy classifications (total ban, ban at ≤ 18 weeks, ban after 18 weeks, no gestational ban) and partisan control of governors, legislatures, and senates. Multivariable regressions adjusted for sociodemographic, economic, and healthcare variables.
resultsUnadjusted analyses showed MMR and IMR were higher on average in Republican-led states (27 vs. 20 per 100,000; 6.3 vs. 5.0 per 1,000; all p < 0.01), with political control accounting for up to one-quarter of the variance (R²=0.21–0.25). In adjusted models, total abortion bans were correlated with higher MMR (β = 5.28, p = 0.0315, R²=0.81) and IMR (β = 1.15, p = 0.0014, R²=0.86). Higher mortality correlated with greater fertility and larger Black population shares; protective factors included higher income, state investment, education, life expectancy, Hispanic population, and healthcare access. These patterns clustered by party control.
conclusionsIn this ecological analysis, abortion bans and Republican political control were correlated with higher maternal and infant mortality at the state level. While individual-level causality cannot be inferred, addressing structural disparities may help reduce preventable deaths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.