Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41845270›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2026

Sensory impairments and caregiver burden: a population-based study of older adults in Thailand.

Patama Vapattanawong, Ruttana Phetsitong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patama VapattanawongInstitute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, Phutthamonthon 4 Road, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Ruttana PhetsitongFaculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Phutthamonthon 4 Road, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand. ruttana.phe@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual and hearing impairments can increase dependence across the life course; however, their impact may be particularly pronounced in older adults due to age-related functional decline and increased care needs. This study examined how caregiver burden differs by type of sensory impairment, including vision impairment, hearing impairment, and dual sensory impairment.

methodsA cross-sectional secondary data analysis was performed. Data were obtained from the 2021 Survey of Older Persons in Thailand, conducted by the National Statistical Office. The study sample comprised 3,190 pairs of older adults aged 60 and above and their primary caregivers. Visual and hearing impairments were defined based on self-reported functional difficulty with or without assistive devices. Caregiver burden was assessed using a self-reported single-item question on a 0–10 scale, with a higher score indicating greater burden, and was recoded into three categories: no burden (score 0), low burden (scores 1–3), and high burden (scores ≥ 4), based on the median score. Generalized ordinal logistic regression, adjusted for caregiver background, older adults’ health status, physical environment, and socioeconomic factors within the older adults’ household, was used to examine the relationship between caregiver burden and sensory impairments.

resultsAmong older adults, 13.3%, 11.9%, and 27.0% had visual impairment, hearing impairment, and dual sensory impairment, respectively. Median burden score was 3 (IQR: 0–5), indicating low burden overall. Compared to caregivers of older adults without sensory impairments, those caring for individuals with hearing impairment were more likely to report higher levels of burden (AOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.24–1.94). Elevated odds of burden were also observed for caregivers of older adults with dual sensory impairments (AOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08–1.54) and vision-only impairment (AOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02–1.56).

conclusionsHearing impairment was associated with elevated caregiver burden, with the association being stronger than that observed for dual sensory impairments. This counterintuitive finding may reflect communication barriers, social isolation, and the less obvious nature of hearing loss, but it should be viewed with caution because of unmeasured factors like impairment severity and support availability.

Indexed as

Caregiver BurdenCaregiversCost of IllnessHearing LossPopulation SurveillanceVision DisordersAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedThailandCaregiver burdenDual sensory impairmentsHearing impairmentOlder adultsSensory impairmentsThailandVisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID41845270
PMCPMC13112696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.