ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
SCW: building the whole-genome 3D structures based on extremely sparse single-cell Hi-C data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe study of three-dimensional (3D) genome structures at the single-cell level is crucial for understanding cell-to-cell variability. However, it is challenging to reconstruct the 3D structures of the whole genome based on single-cell Hi-C data because of the sparseness of the single-cell Hi-C data and the complexity of the problem.
resultsTo address this, we developed a new computational method, named SCW (single-cell whole-genome), to build the high-resolution 3D genome structures of the whole genome based on extremely sparse single-cell Hi-C data (either zeros or ones in the Hi-C matrix). We evaluated our reconstructed 3D genome structures on various types of cells, checked the fitness of the reconstructed 3D structures to the single-cell Hi-C data, cross-validated the reconstructed structures with FISH data, bulk Hi-C data, and gene expression data, and then compared SCW with the state-of-the-art tools Nuc_dynamics, Hickit, and Tensor-FLAMINGO. SCW achieved better robustness as Nuc_dynamics failed on extremely sparse Hi-C matrices that contained only zeros or ones. The Pearson Correlation between our reconstructed 3D structure and the FISH data can reach 0.63, which is higher than the structures built by Hickit. SCW can also build better structures compared to Tensor-FLAMINGO based on multiple evaluations, particularly with the 20 Kbp resolution. Both the intra- and inter-chromosomal contact patterns are maintained in our reconstructed 3D structures, which also match the findings from single-cell gene expression data.
conclusionsSCW enables high-precision whole-genome 3D reconstruction from extremely sparse single-cell Hi-C data. SCW outperforms existing tools in structural accuracy and robustly maintains intra/inter-chromosomal contacts. Its versatility is validated across diverse cell types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.