Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41845215›Full record

ArticleCellular & molecular biology letters2026

Dichotomous SMAD2/3 regulation and selective antihypertrophic activity of heparin during in vitro chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stromal cells.

Sven Schmidt, Safak Chasan, Helen F Dietmar, Felicia A M Klampfleuthner, Eliane Hesse, Tilman Walker, Uwe Freudenberg, Wiltrud Richter, Solvig Diederichs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular & molecular biology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sven SchmidtExperimental Orthopaedics, Research Centre for Molecular and Regenerative Orthopaedics, Department for Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0558-4001
Safak ChasanExperimental Orthopaedics, Research Centre for Molecular and Regenerative Orthopaedics, Department for Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7558-6032
Helen F DietmarExperimental Orthopaedics, Research Centre for Molecular and Regenerative Orthopaedics, Department for Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8409-3221
Felicia A M KlampfleuthnerExperimental Orthopaedics, Research Centre for Molecular and Regenerative Orthopaedics, Department for Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2684-6890
Eliane HesseExperimental Orthopaedics, Research Centre for Molecular and Regenerative Orthopaedics, Department for Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0058-4619
Tilman WalkerDepartment for Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9439-0841
Uwe FreudenbergLeibniz Institute of Polymer Research Dresden (IPF), Max Bergmann Centre of Biomaterials Dresden (MBC), Centre for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1359-1095
Wiltrud RichterExperimental Orthopaedics, Research Centre for Molecular and Regenerative Orthopaedics, Department for Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4694-2768
Solvig DiederichsExperimental Orthopaedics, Research Centre for Molecular and Regenerative Orthopaedics, Department for Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany. solvig.diederichs@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2527-9517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndochondral instead of chondral differentiation hinders mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) application for clinical cartilage regeneration. We previously showed that heparin-polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogels loaded with transforming growth factor TGF-β instructed stable chondral MSC development in vivo. Here, we assessed this approach in vitro, utilizing heparin-PEG hydrogels or the pellet culture system with soluble heparin supplementation of chondrogenic medium.

methodsHuman MSCs were cultured in heparin-PEG hydrogels (22.4 mg/mL crosslinked heparin, 120 ng TGF-β1) or as pellet cultures treated with soluble heparin (0, 10, 100, 700 μg/mL) in TGF-β1-containing (10 ng/mL) chondrogenic medium. Chondral and endochondral signaling (1-3 h, 4 weeks) and cartilage matrix formation (4 weeks) were analyzed using western blot, histology, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and enzyme activity.

resultsUnlike in vivo, human MSCs differentiated in heparin-PEG hydrogels into type X collagen and alkaline phosphatase-positive hypertrophic chondrocytes in vitro. Interestingly, treating MSC pellets with soluble heparin (10-700 µg/mL) revealed reduced TGF-β-SMAD3 but not SMAD2 activation at unaffected type II collagen and proteoglycan/DNA levels. We propose that the stimulation of the insulin-AKT pathway by heparin aided in maintaining SMAD2 activation, which apparently plays a more prominent role than SMAD3 for MSC chondrogenesis. Heparin treatment inhibited the pro-hypertrophic WNT/β-catenin pathway in vitro but insufficiently silenced TGF-β-SMAD1/5/9 activation and unfortunately reduced antihypertrophic prostaglandin PGE2 levels. Ultimately, treatment with 10 µg/mL heparin reduced the upregulation of several hypertrophy markers (MEF2C, IHH, IBSP messenger RNAs [mRNAs], alkaline phosphatase activity) below control levels, but type X collagen remained unresponsive. Thus, soluble heparin treatment was similarly selective and effective as previous antihypertrophic interventions (PTHrP pulses, WNT inhibition), while offering technical simplicity, reduced cost, and solvent-free formulation.

conclusionsTaken together, heparin-TGF-β showed a novel dichotomous SMAD2/3 inhibition at maintained chondrogenic differentiation and context-dependent lineage-instructive properties-permitting endochondral commitment in vitro but chondral development in vivo. Thus, environmental contributions are mandatory to allow heparin-PEG-guided chondral versus endochondral lineage commitment of MSCs in vivo, potentially involving SMAD1/5/9 suppressors and PGE2 sources.

Indexed as

ChondrogenesisHeparinMesenchymal Stem CellsSmad2 ProteinSmad3 ProteinCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedChondrocytesHumansHydrogelsHypertrophyPolyethylene GlycolsHeparinHydrogelsPolyethylene GlycolsSmad2 ProteinSMAD2 protein, humanSmad3 ProteinSMAD3 protein, humanAKTChondrocyte hypertrophyEndochondral developmentHeparan sulfateHeparinProstaglandinSMADStem cellsTGF-βWNT/β-catenin

Identifiers

PMID41845215
PMCPMC13064404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.