ArticleClinical proteomics2026
Quantitative enrichment of amyloid precursors refines mass spectrometry-based amyloidosis diagnosis.
Article in Clinical proteomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAmyloidosis typing is crucial to determine the best therapeutic strategy for patients. Since conventional histological techniques often fail, the identification of amyloid precursors by mass spectrometry has become the new standard. However, without quantification, selecting the amyloid precursor from proteins that may be ubiquitous under non-pathological conditions can be equivocal. Therefore, we quantified protein enrichment in amyloid deposits to improve amyloidosis typing.
methodsProtein enrichment was measured by extracted ion chromatogram-based label-free quantification by comparing a microdissected amyloid area to a non-amyloid area. We assessed the discrimination ability of candidate precursors with this approach compared to the two practiced identification methods.
resultsAs a proof of concept, we selected 9 cases including the most common amyloidosis subtypes, 6 typed by immunohistochemistry and 3 inconclusive by immunohistochemistry. Proteins associated with amyloid deposits were identified in all samples, confirming the pathology. Where the routine clinical mass spectrometric identification techniques allowed unambiguous conclusions for 3 of 9 cases, quantification of the enrichment ratio in amyloid deposits allowed unambiguous precursor selection in all cases.
conclusionQuantification of precursor enrichment in amyloid deposits is a promising optimization for amyloidosis typing, which should be studied in larger cohorts. Incorporated into routine clinical processes, it could improve patient care in difficult diagnostic situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.