ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Respiratory microbiota maturation enables machine learning based age prediction in chickens.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding how the respiratory microbiota matures with age is key to improving poultry health and pathogen surveillance, yet the ecological processes shaping this transition remain elusive. We aimed to develop an interpretable machine-learning framework capable of identifying age-associated microbial signatures within the chicken nasal microbiota across heterogeneous datasets.
resultsWe compiled data from five independent chicken studies and normalized microbial abundances using Counts Per Million (CPM). To address dataset imbalance and ensure cross-study generalizability, we implemented SMOTE over-sampling and a Leave-One-Study-Out (LOSO) cross-validation framework. Within this architecture, we utilized Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) to identify a stable consensus signature composed of taxa persisting in at least 70% of the iterations. We benchmarked five algorithms: Classification and Regression Trees (CART), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). RF emerged as the best model, achieving a balanced accuracy of 0.965 and a Kappa of 0.920. Consequently, the contribution of each feature was quantified through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values on the selected RF model, enabling transparent interpretation of age-dependent microbial patterns. This approach distilled a compact set of predictive taxa, including Corynebacterium, Kocuria, and members of the Micrococcaceae. External validation with longitudinal samples from a Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus (HPAIV) infection confirmed full generalization, with all 57 samples from 22 chickens correctly classified even under viral-induced conditions.
conclusionsThe proposed workflow combining LOSO-based feature selection, class-balancing, and interpretable machine learning provides a transferable framework for microbiota-based age inference. Such approaches may inform health monitoring, management of poultry production systems, and wildlife surveillance, illustrating the power of interpretable artificial intelligence to reveal conserved host-microbe dynamics across avian systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.