ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Genome-resolved, preclinical safety evaluation of infant-derived Clostridium butyricum S-45-5 as a probiotic candidate.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Probiotics in Autoimmune Disease: Strain-specific Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClostridium butyricum is a butyrate-producing, spore-forming bacterium present in the human gut microbiota and fermented foods that has emerged as a next-generation probiotic candidate. The infant-derived strain C. butyricum S-45-5 exhibits desirable probiotic traits, including acid and bile tolerance, antimicrobial activity against intestinal pathogens and broad-spectrum antiviral effects in vitro and in vivo. However, its strain-specific safety at exposure levels relevant for human use has not been rigorously established. We therefore sought to characterise the safety of C. butyricum S-45-5 using a genome-resolved, microbiology-centred approach complemented by guideline-aligned toxicology.
resultsHybrid long- and short-read sequencing yielded a closed, two-replicon genome for S-45-5. In silico screening against VirulenceFinder, PathogenFinder and ToxFinder detected no virulence- or toxin-associated genes, and ABRicate/MEGARes did not identify acquired antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants. A single intact prophage region was observed, none harbouring virulence or AMR genes. In vitro assays showed low cytotoxicity towards Caco-2 cells compared with Escherichia coli O157:H7, a γ-hemolytic (non-hemolytic) phenotype on blood agar, and no detectable D-lactate or bile salt hydrolase activity. E-test MICs indicated susceptibility to six clinically relevant antibiotics; elevated aminoglycoside MICs were consistent with intrinsic low susceptibility of obligate anaerobes and were not associated with acquired AMR genes. In OECD/GLP-compliant studies, S-45-5 was well-tolerated in acute and 90-day oral toxicity studies in rats (no-observed-adverse-effect level, 2,000 mg/kg/day), and genotoxicity tests were negative.
conclusionsGenomic, phenotypic and toxicological data converge to indicate that C. butyricum S-45-5 lacks recognised virulence and acquired AMR determinants, displays a benign in vitro safety profile and does not induce adverse effects or genotoxicity in preclinical models, even at high exposure levels. These findings provide a robust preclinical safety foundation for the development of C. butyricum S-45-5 as a probiotic or food-associated microorganism and may help to inform safety evaluation approaches for other next-generation probiotic candidates.These integrated genomic, phenotypic and OECD/GLP toxicology data support a favourable preclinical safety profile for C. butyricum S-45-5 at high exposure levels, supporting its development as a probiotic or food-associated microorganism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.