ArticleOdontology2026
Comparative analysis of postoperative mechanical behavior of immature premolars: apexification vs regeneration.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the mechanical behavior of lower premolars with incomplete root formation treated by apexification and regeneration and assess revascularization's impact on dentin thickness using finite element analysis. A mandibular bone model was obtained from a computed tomography scan and modeled using the CAD Rhinoceros 7.0 software program. The models were composed of enamel, dentin, pulp, periodontal ligament, cortical bone, medullary bone, gutta-percha, MTA, blood clot, and composite resin. The study groups were: IT (Intact Tooth); AC (Accessed Tooth); R (revascularization); and AX (apexification). After modeling the structures, the geometries were exported to the Ansys 13.0 finite element analysis software program. The models were submitted to loads of 200 N on the distal sulcus of the occlusal surface. The loading was directed at 45° to the occlusal plane. The results were calculated and qualitatively analyzed using displacement maps and maximum principal stress. The apexification models supported lower compressive and tensile stresses when compared to the revascularization models. Revascularization reduced stress concentration in the periradicular tissues, whereas apexification resulted in lower tensile stress in coronal dentin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.