ArticleNeurocritical care2026
Analysis of the External Validity of the RAISE Score for Prediction of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in a United States-Based Cohort of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveOutcomes for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) have improved substantially through the years, but there remains room for improvement. The RAISE (pRolonged ventilAtion In Subarachnoid hEmorrhage) score was designed to predict which SAH patients will require prolonged mechanical ventilation. We sought to assess the external validity of the RAISE score in our patient population.
methodsThis was a single center retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to the neurointensive care unit with non-traumatic SAH from July 2017-July 2025. The ability of the RAISE score to differentiate between patients with varying risk profiles was assessed. The predicted probabilities of mechanical ventilation duration > 7 days were compared to observed frequencies, and a calibration plot was generated. Multivariable logistic regression was also employed to examine if the components of the RAISE score were significantly associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation in our cohort.
resultsA total of 202 patients met study criteria. Of these, 49 (24.3%) were mechanically ventilated > 7 days. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85, and the calibration slope was 0.60, suggestive of overfitting. Of the 5 RAISE score components, only Hunt-Hess grade (p < 0.001) was significantly associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation in logistic regression.
conclusionWhile the RAISE score performed well in its original cohort and can discriminate between various risk categories for prolonged mechanical ventilation, results indicate that the score is overfit to the original study population or that there are other confounders present such as differences in practices surrounding intubation, ventilation, and extubation. Future studies could consider utilizing another cohort for assessing external validity or designing a novel scoring system for prediction of prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41845147What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.