Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41845146›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Cumulative input sensitivity predicts both attenuation and stability of lexically guided perceptual learning.

Shawn N Cummings, Emma C Hodges, Rachel M Theodore

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Short-term and long-term adaptive changes in prosodic comprehension.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shawn N CummingsDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, 2 Alethia Drive, Unit 1085, Storrs, CT, 06269-1085, USA.
Emma C HodgesDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, 2 Alethia Drive, Unit 1085, Storrs, CT, 06269-1085, USA.
Rachel M TheodoreDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, 2 Alethia Drive, Unit 1085, Storrs, CT, 06269-1085, USA. rachel.theodore@uconn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4601-8340

Funding

U.S. National Science Foundation 1735225U.S. National Science Foundation 1827591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listeners can use lexical information to accommodate ambiguity in speech input. Some evidence suggests that lexically guided perceptual learning persists over time. However, other evidence suggests that lexically guided perceptual learning attenuates throughout the test session, consistent with learning that occurs given exposure to the test stimuli. The current study aimed to determine whether this apparent discrepancy could be resolved when viewed through the lens of the belief-updating theory of speech adaptation, which posits continuous sensitivity to statistical cues in speech input. During exposure, listeners (n = 160) heard speech sounds ambiguous between /ʃ/ and /s/ in a lexically-biasing context. At test, listeners categorized tokens from an ashi-asi continuum. Critically, the duration of the initial test phase was manipulated between subjects to be either brief or long. Approximately 24 hours later, all listeners completed a second test phase. Though evidence of lexically guided perceptual learning was present at all timepoints for both biasing groups, attenuation of learning was observed given continued testing. Strikingly, the position of the 24-hour time delay relative to duration of the initial test had no significant effect on learning. These results and a re-analysis of previous work align a seemingly mixed literature under a unifying account characterizing lexically guided perceptual learning as an iterative, continuous sensitivity to dynamic changes in speech input that is insensitive to time alone in the initial 24-hour learning window.

Indexed as

LearningSpeech PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultLanguage comprehension; speech perception; perceptual learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.