ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Cumulative input sensitivity predicts both attenuation and stability of lexically guided perceptual learning.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Short-term and long-term adaptive changes in prosodic comprehension.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Listeners can use lexical information to accommodate ambiguity in speech input. Some evidence suggests that lexically guided perceptual learning persists over time. However, other evidence suggests that lexically guided perceptual learning attenuates throughout the test session, consistent with learning that occurs given exposure to the test stimuli. The current study aimed to determine whether this apparent discrepancy could be resolved when viewed through the lens of the belief-updating theory of speech adaptation, which posits continuous sensitivity to statistical cues in speech input. During exposure, listeners (n = 160) heard speech sounds ambiguous between /ʃ/ and /s/ in a lexically-biasing context. At test, listeners categorized tokens from an ashi-asi continuum. Critically, the duration of the initial test phase was manipulated between subjects to be either brief or long. Approximately 24 hours later, all listeners completed a second test phase. Though evidence of lexically guided perceptual learning was present at all timepoints for both biasing groups, attenuation of learning was observed given continued testing. Strikingly, the position of the 24-hour time delay relative to duration of the initial test had no significant effect on learning. These results and a re-analysis of previous work align a seemingly mixed literature under a unifying account characterizing lexically guided perceptual learning as an iterative, continuous sensitivity to dynamic changes in speech input that is insensitive to time alone in the initial 24-hour learning window.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41845146What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.