ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Characterization of the Ideal Speed of Sound for Plantar Soft Tissue Using Quasi-Simultaneous Ultrasound and Computed Tomography in Cadaveric Feet.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical ultrasound systems typically assume a speed of sound of 1540 m/s for reconstructing images. However, the speed of sound varies between tissues, and this assumption creates distortions and errors in representing the thickness of tissue structures. Quasi-simultaneous (i.e., taken subsequently without movement of the specimen) computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound scans at various speeds of sound (1480, 1540, 1600, and 1660 m/s) were taken at the calcaneus and the second metatarsal head for seven cadaveric feet. A speed of sound of 1600 m/s demonstrated the lowest bias with a mean signed error of - 0.06 mm for the calcaneus and - 0.19 mm for the second metatarsal head, while for 1540 m/s, the calcaneus had a bias of - 0.44 mm, and the second metatarsal head had a bias of - 0.67 mm. The CT-derived distance was used to estimate the ideal speed of sound by calculating the slope of the change in distance with the change in speed of sound and was found to be 1616.6 ± 76.5 m/s for the calcaneus and 1623.9 ± 63.6 m/s for the second metatarsal head. However, limitations in the use of cadavers, CT as the reference standard, and methodological assumptions in analysis limit the extent to which these findings can be generalized to in vivo conditions. This work suggests that using an assumed speed of sound greater than 1540 m/s may be more appropriate for imaging plantar soft tissue; however, additional in vivo studies are needed to corroborate this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41845143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.