Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41845128›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026

Safety and feasibility of the versius robotic surgical system for colorectal resection: proportional meta-analysis of single-arm studies.

Xiaxia Li, Yi Liu, Guozhou Chen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaxia Li *The Second Clinical School of Gansu, University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.
Yi Liu *The Second Clinical School of Gansu, University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.
Guozhou Chen *The Second Clinical School of Gansu, University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China. cgz73s@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designed to circumvent the ergonomic constraints and technical rigidity inherent in conventional laparoscopy and monolithic robotic units, the Versius Surgical System represents a novel modular approach to minimally invasive surgery. The primary objective of this research was to conduct a single-arm meta-analysis to quantitatively assess the clinical safety, technical feasibility, and perioperative metrics associated with Versius-guided colorectal resections. A systematic and exhaustive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify relevant studies published through December 2025, with the aim of capturing all eligible research in the field up to that date. Eligible studies reporting clinical outcomes of Versius-assisted colorectal surgery were included. A single-arm meta-analysis was carried out using Stata 18 SE. For continuous variables, pooled means and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, whereas proportional outcomes were combined using the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation to stabilize variance. To investigate potential sources of heterogeneity, both subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed, ensuring the robustness and reliability of the synthesized results. Eight studies comprising 547 patients were included. The pooled conversion rate to open surgery was 4% (95% CI: 0.02–0.07; I² = 0.31%). The overall postoperative complication rate was 22% (95% CI: 0.15–0.31), with a low major complication rate (Clavien–Dindo ≥ III) of 3% (95% CI: 0.01–0.05). The pooled mean operative time was 242.42 min (95% CI: 197.86–286.99), with subgroup analyses showing shorter operative times for right hemicolectomy (203.97 min) compared with anterior resection (280.80 min). Postoperative recovery was generally favorable, with patients experiencing a mean hospital stay of 6.90 days (95% CI: 6.05–7.75) and a mean time to bowel function recovery of 2.88 days (95% CI: 2.48–3.29). Sensitivity analyses further confirmed the stability and reliability of these pooled estimates, indicating consistency across studies. Versius-assisted colorectal resection appears to be safe and technically feasible, demonstrating low conversion and major complication rates. While operative times suggest an initial learning curve, perioperative and recovery outcomes are comparable to established robotic platforms. Further prospective, multi-center studies are required to assess long-term functional and oncological outcomes.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresColorectal Surgical ProceduresConversion to Open SurgeryFeasibility StudiesHumansOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsColorectal resectionMeta-analysisRobotic surgerySafety and feasibilityVersius

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.