ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Automated Dental Age Estimation from Panoramic Radiographs using an Interpretable Deep Learning Model.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Explainable artificial intelligence in dental imaging: a systematic review of interpretability and the current state of trust evidence.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dental age estimation serves as a crucial foundation for forensic identification and pediatric dental assessment. Yet traditional methods, including the Demirjian and Willems standards, depend on subjective staging of tooth mineralization, resulting in observer variability and reduced applicability in routine practice. We developed an interpretable deep learning model trained on 7,207 panoramic radiographs from individuals aged 3.00–14.99 years. In five-fold cross-validation, the model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.67 years, a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.87 years, and an R² of 0.92, outperforming benchmark deep architectures. Compared with expert assessments, the model yielded lower MAEs (0.78 vs. 0.92 years) and markedly shortened processing time. To enhance clinical reliability, the model self-assesses its confidence for each estimation, providing a predictive range. The 95% prediction intervals with a mean width of 2.76 years and 94.32% coverage. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping confirmed biologically plausible attention to dental regions such as molars and root apices. The proposed model enables accurate, efficient, and interpretable dental age estimation with quantified uncertainty, supporting its potential application in forensic and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41845068What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.