ReviewJournal of neurology2026
Artificial intelligence in neurology practice: promise, perils, and a roadmap for responsible integration.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Algorithm to Policy: A Bibliometric Analysis of Implementation Science and Governance Frameworks in AI Healthcare Research (2016-2026).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in neurology, offering unprecedented potential to enhance diagnostic precision, streamline clinical workflows, and accelerate translational research. However, the integration of AI into routine neurology practice is accompanied by substantial challenges, including inherent biases in training datasets, regulatory ambiguities, and risks associated with over-reliance on algorithmic outputs, which also expose critical gaps in neurology education and research infrastructure. This review synthesizes the current state of AI applications in neurology with a focus on stroke detection and electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis for epilepsy and examines critical pitfalls exemplified by IBM Watson's underperformance in neuro-oncology. Our methodology involved a targeted literature search of studies published between January 2018 and December 2024, prioritizing large multicenter validations, reports on demographic diversity, and implementations in non-Western settings. We further outline actionable recommendations to mitigate these risks, emphasizing the need for multicultural training datasets, standardized regulatory frameworks, structured human-AI collaboration models centered on "AI steward" roles, and strengthened AI education and research infrastructure. By addressing these contemporary issues in practice, education, and research, neurology can harness the full promise of AI while safeguarding patient care equity and quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41845047What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.