Observational studyJournal of human hypertension2026
A multi-centre study of prescribing patterns for the management of resistant hypertension amongst cardiologists.
Observational study in Journal of human hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resistant hypertension is conventionally defined as failure to achieve blood pressure control despite treatment with optimal or maximally tolerated doses of three antihypertensive drugs, typically including a renin-angiotensin system blocker, a calcium channel blocker, and a diuretic. In real-world practice, however, many patients receive four or more antihypertensive agents without necessarily fulfilling classical resistant hypertension criteria, and data describing such prescribing patterns among cardiologists are limited. We conducted a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional observational study across 10 cardiology outpatient centres enrolling consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) receiving more than three antihypertensive drugs. Patients with renal denervation, renal transplantation, known renal artery stenosis, or incomplete data were excluded. Demographic characteristics, blood pressure, comorbidities, and antihypertensive prescriptions were recorded, with a predefined analysis of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use in the overall cohort and in patients meeting guideline criteria for resistant hypertension. A total of 420 patients were included (mean age 65.2 years; male-to-female ratio 1:0.8). Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics were prescribed in 89, 85, and 82% of patients, respectively, while beta-blocker use was high at 85%. Overall MRA use was low at 39%. Among patients fulfilling criteria for resistant hypertension (n = 273), MRA use was 27%, increasing to only 38% when serum potassium was ≤4.5 mEq/L. Serum potassium ≤4.5 mEq/L was the only independent predictor of MRA prescription. These findings highlight substantial underutilization of MRAs in real-world practice and an important opportunity to improve guideline-directed management of resistant hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41845044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.