ArticleCommunications biology2026
Molecular resilience of neurons to repetitive mechanical compression.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cells and organs constantly experience mechanical forces. Neurons, in particular, are exposed to such stimuli during development, aging, disease, and normal activities like movement and homeostasis. Recent studies highlight the key role of microtubules (MTs) in mechanotransduction, adjusting cytoskeletal dynamics in response to mechanical cues. While the effects of acute forces on MTs are known, the impact of repetitive mechanical stimuli over time remains unclear. In this study, we applied repetitive mechanical motion to neurons from the dorsal root ganglia and analyzed responses at varying strain levels. A 10% strain caused MT and organelle damage, leading to cell death. In contrast, a 2.5% strain did not harm cells and instead stabilized MTs. A 5% strain caused damage to the MT structure and leads to MT destabilization, but neurons activate a molecular response to counteract and recover from this damage, suggesting the involvement of the Ras pathway in response to injury. These findings suggest that neurons can adapt to repetitive mechanical stress, maintaining homeostasis when strain is below a certain threshold. Our results improve understanding of how mechanical forces influence neuronal structure and function, and how cells respond to injury by initiating protective pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.