ArticleScientific reports2026
Factors associated with occupational calling among psychiatric nurses: a Bayesian network model analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the current status of occupational calling among psychiatric nurses, identify its correlated factors, and explore the probabilistic dependencies and network structure using a Bayesian network model. In June 2024, a convenience sample of 216 psychiatric nurses was recruited from a tertiary Grade A hospital in Mianyang City. Participants completed a questionnaire including demographic characteristics and scales for occupational calling, job involvement, professional identity, and work-family conflict. LASSO regression was used to screen key factors associated with occupational calling, and Bayesian network analysis was performed to explore the interrelationships among these factors. The mean score for occupational calling was 3.72 ± 0.65.Mean scores for job involvement, professional identity, and work-family conflict were 4.50 ± 1.36, 5.48 ± 0.74, and 2.61 ± 0.67, respectively. LASSO regression identified educational level (β=-0.19),nursing position(POST)(β = 0.08), professional title (β = 0.01), employment type (β = 0.06), professional identity (β = 0.20), work-family conflict (β = -0.19), and job involvement (β = 0.13) as factors associated with occupational calling, with professional identity showing the strongest association. The Bayesian network further revealed that POST, professional title, work-family conflict, and job involvement were directly associated with occupational calling, whereas educational level and employment type were indirectly linked to occupational calling through professional identity and job involvement, respectively. LASSO coefficient path analysis indicated that professional identity and job involvement maintained stronger and more stable associations across varying penalty levels, while demographic factors showed weaker and less stable associations. Occupational calling among psychiatric nurses is associated with a combination of demographic and psychosocial factors. LASSO coefficient path analysis demonstrated that psychosocial factors—particularly professional identity and job involvement—showed stronger and more stable associations with occupational calling than demographic characteristics whereas Work-family conflict exhibited a stable negative association throughout the regularization path. These findings provide preliminary evidence that strategies targeting the enhancement of professional identity, promotion of job involvement, and alleviation of work-family conflict may be associated with higher levels of occupational calling in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.