Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41844949›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2026

Tracking Microplastics From Source to Impact: A Review of Environmental Presence, Exposure, Remediation, and Health Risks.

Imari Walker-Franklin, Anna Villalobos Santeli, Natalia Neal-Walthall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Imari Walker-FranklinDiscovery Sciences, RTI International, Johnson Building, Rm 215 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27704, USA. iwalkerfranklin@rti.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-320X
Anna Villalobos SanteliDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9164-4912
Natalia Neal-WalthallICF International, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27713, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9109-7367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPlastics are widely used for their affordability and versatility, but their accumulation in the environment raises growing concerns. Microplastics (MPs), formed intentionally or through degradation of larger plastics, are persistent and pervasive. This review explores recent findings on environmental occurrence, human exposure, health effects, and strategies for MP removal. Information on nanoplastics (NPs) was included when available. RECENT

findingsMPs from major plastic types are increasingly found in environmental compartments and in human fluids, tissues, and organs. Emerging evidence links MP exposure to adverse digestive and respiratory health effects. While some remediation strategies show potential in reducing environmental MP release, research is still limited on effectively minimizing human exposure. Future research should emphasize using well-characterized reference MP materials in human health and remediation studies. These materials must be relevant in size, shape, and polymer type to those identified in environmental and exposure studies, improving the accuracy and applicability of findings.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationMicroplasticsPlasticsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansEnvironmental PollutantsMicroplasticsPlasticsFate and transportHealth effectsMicroplasticsOccurrencePlastic pollutionRemediation

Identifiers

PMID41844949
PMCPMC12995963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.