ArticleScientific reports2026
Altitude-resolved prediction of roadside air pollution using UAV measurements and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Roadside areas are major sources of traffic-related air pollutant emissions. This study identified the spatial distribution of roadside pollutants using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) measurements and predicted their concentrations with machine learning models. Pollutant concentrations decreased with increasing altitude and distance from roads, with NO₂ and O₃ showing similar patterns. NO₂ levels peaked at 7 a.m. due to heavy traffic. Seasonally, O₃ concentrations were higher in summer due to higher solar radiation. PM2.5 levels also increased in summer, with long-range transport influences confirmed using the HYSPLIT model. The UAV/Ground concentration ratio was predicted for each pollutant using machine learning models. Among them, the CatBoost model, with the highest R² value (0.65–0.95), was selected as the final model. SHAP-based feature importance analysis indicated that NO2 and PM2.5 UAV/Ground ratio predictions were influenced by ground-level concentrations and meteorology, while O3 was primarily associated with meteorological and seasonal features. CO was influenced by traffic speed, which showed a negative association with the ratio. The proposed UAV-integrated machine learning framework provides a novel approach for high-resolution, three-dimensional estimation of roadside air quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.