ArticleScientific reports2026
Phonological complexity, speech style, and individual differences influence ASR performance for Tarifit.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toolkit for acoustic-phonetic analysis of naturalistic speech data.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines individual differences through the lens of automatic speech recognition (ASR) transfer (applying ASR trained on one language to a new language) from Arabic to Tarifit, an under-resourced Amazigh language with typologically rare phonological structures. Thirty-seven native Tarifit speakers produced target words in both clear and casual speaking styles, allowing us to assess how phonological complexity and speech clarity interact to influence ASR performance. Results show that clear speech significantly improves recognition accuracy, particularly for words with rising sonority onset clusters. In contrast, falling sonority clusters and initial geminate consonants, which are both typologically marked structures, yield higher error rates even when spoken clearly. Importantly, we observe substantial speaker-level variability in ASR outcomes, though demographic factors such as age and gender do not predict performance. These findings suggest that individual differences in speech production and phonological encoding play a critical role in shaping ASR recognition success. By leveraging ASR as a proxy for perceptual processing, this work contributes to our understanding of how phonological structure and speaker variability jointly influence speech perception, with implications for inclusive ASR design and phonological theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.