Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41844925›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Phonological complexity, speech style, and individual differences influence ASR performance for Tarifit.

Mohamed Afkir, Georgia Zellou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohamed AfkirPhonetics Lab, Linguistics Department, UC Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. mafkir@ucdavis.edu.
Georgia ZellouPhonetics Lab, Linguistics Department, UC Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines individual differences through the lens of automatic speech recognition (ASR) transfer (applying ASR trained on one language to a new language) from Arabic to Tarifit, an under-resourced Amazigh language with typologically rare phonological structures. Thirty-seven native Tarifit speakers produced target words in both clear and casual speaking styles, allowing us to assess how phonological complexity and speech clarity interact to influence ASR performance. Results show that clear speech significantly improves recognition accuracy, particularly for words with rising sonority onset clusters. In contrast, falling sonority clusters and initial geminate consonants, which are both typologically marked structures, yield higher error rates even when spoken clearly. Importantly, we observe substantial speaker-level variability in ASR outcomes, though demographic factors such as age and gender do not predict performance. These findings suggest that individual differences in speech production and phonological encoding play a critical role in shaping ASR recognition success. By leveraging ASR as a proxy for perceptual processing, this work contributes to our understanding of how phonological structure and speaker variability jointly influence speech perception, with implications for inclusive ASR design and phonological theory.

Indexed as

IndividualityLanguagePhoneticsSpeechSpeech PerceptionFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID41844925
PMCPMC13128883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.