ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
A proposed ethical framework for informed consent in elective robotic telesurgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical application of robotic telesurgery in the Brazilian public health system: a consecutive case series.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guidelines for informed consent (IC) in telesurgery are not well-defined. Ethical frameworks for clinic innovation generally focus on four key concerns, IC, safety/efficacy, patient vulnerability and conflicts of interest. The purpose of this paper is to review published recommendations on IC for telesurgery and create an ethics framework for elective telesurgical IC. A scoping literature review was performed using search terms Telesurg* AND (guideline OR consensus) in PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases. Full text English language articles published by December 18, 2025 were included. Manuscripts were excluded if clinical telesurgery was not the subject or no formal recommendations were made regarding the IC process. A ethics framework for IC was developed based on relevant literature. 83 articles were reviewed and 4 relevant manuscripts were identified. An ethics framework for IC is proposed based on the available literature and can be further adapted regionally. A local and virtual interactive multi-stage consent process is suggested. A structured disclosure approach with key elements is outlined. Relevant terminology is defined, including implicit and explicit (situational, surgeon-specific and shared responsibility) disclosure elements. IC with disclosure of situational, local and remote surgeon-specific elements, and any shared accountability is the best practice standard for elective telesurgical consent. A multi-stage local and virtual interactive consent process should be offered in an opt-out fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.