Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41844889›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Association of a standardized painless ward model with cancer pain control and hospitalization outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

Hua Chen, Liu Yang, Yunting He, Xiaoye Liang, Yunjun Liu, Yisheng Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hua ChenDepartment of Oncology, Maoming People's Hospital, 101 Weimin Road, Maoming, Guangdong, China.
Liu YangDepartment of Ultrasound, Maoming People's Hospital, 101 Weimin Road, Maoming, Guangdong, China.
Yunting HeDepartment of Oncology, Maoming People's Hospital, 101 Weimin Road, Maoming, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoye LiangDepartment of Oncology, Maoming People's Hospital, 101 Weimin Road, Maoming, Guangdong, China.
Yunjun LiuDepartment of Oncology, Maoming People's Hospital, 101 Weimin Road, Maoming, Guangdong, China.
Yisheng HuangDepartment of Oncology, Maoming People's Hospital, 101 Weimin Road, Maoming, Guangdong, China. hysd999@hotmail.com.

Funding

Maoming City Science and Technology Innovation Development Project 2024kjcxLX0003Maoming City Science and Technology Innovation Development Project 2024kjcxLX045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCancer-related pain remains a major challenge in inpatient oncology care, affecting a large proportion of patients with advanced malignancies. This retrospective cohort study was aimed at evaluating whether implementation of a standardized painless ward model was associated with improved cancer pain control and hospitalization outcomes compared with conventional ward-based care.

methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study included 848 hospitalized patients with pathologically confirmed malignancies and cancer-related pain. Patients admitted before painless ward implementation (general ward, January 2021-December 2022; n = 422) were compared with those admitted after implementation (painless ward, January 2023-December 2024; n = 426). Baseline pain intensity was assessed at admission using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Pain reassessment was performed by trained oncology nursing staff at least once daily and every 4 h when NRS > 4, with physician reassessment when clinically indicated. Pain outcomes at discharge, change in pain intensity during hospitalization (ΔNRS), length of stay (LOS), and prolonged hospitalization (LOS > 10 days) were evaluated. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to adjust for baseline pain and demographic factors.

resultsPatients managed in the painless ward experienced a greater reduction in pain intensity during hospitalization compared with those in the general ward, with a lower prevalence of severe pain (NRS ≥ 7: 15.5% vs. 24.4%) and a lower mean NRS score (3.70 ± 2.27 vs. 4.35 ± 2.62; P < 0.01). Gender- and age-related differences in pain severity observed under conventional care were not observed following painless ward implementation. The painless ward was also associated with a shorter mean LOS (10.15 ± 7.53 vs. 11.72 ± 7.49 days) and a lower proportion of prolonged hospitalization (36.6% vs. 48.1%). Baseline pain severity at admission was higher in the painless ward group (mean NRS 7.39 ± 1.86) than in the general ward group (6.11 ± 2.33; P < 0.001). Despite this, patients managed in the painless ward experienced a greater reduction in pain intensity during hospitalization (mean ΔNRS -3.69 ± 1.30 vs. -1.76 ± 0.68; P < 0.001). After adjustment for baseline NRS, age, and gender, admission to the painless ward remained independently associated with greater pain reduction (β =  -2.00, 95% CI -2.14 to -1.85; P < 0.001). The painless ward was also associated with a shorter mean LOS and a lower proportion of prolonged hospitalization.

conclusionThis real-world study suggests that implementation of a standardized painless ward model is associated with better inpatient cancer pain control, shorter hospitalization duration, and attenuation of demographic differences in pain severity. These findings should be interpreted as associative and warrant confirmation in prospective studies.

Indexed as

Cancer PainHospitalizationNeoplasmsPain ManagementAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesCancer painDemographic disparitiesLength of stayPainless wardPain management

Identifiers

PMID41844889
PMCPMC12995975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.