ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Planimetric quantification of plaque in patients with multibracket appliances using an intraoral scanner - proof-of-concept.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis proof-of-concept study aimed to evaluate whether disclosed dental plaque can be reliably visualized and quantified using an intraoral scanner in patients with multibracket (MB) appliances, despite potential imaging artefacts caused by metallic brackets. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty patients (mean age: 17.0 ± 2.1 years) with fixed MB (Mini Sprint® II or SPEED brackets) underwent 3D-intraoral scans before (T1) and after (T2) bracket debonding. Plaque was visualized using a disclosing agent and quantified planimetrically on selected Ramfjord teeth (FDI 16, 21, 24, 36, 41, 44) using standardized image processing. Five image sets per tooth were analysed to compare plaque coverage (P%) under various conditions: with brackets, after debonding, with masked bracket areas and with the masked areas transferred onto surfaces after debonding, and with only the exposed surface considered. Statistical analyses included t-tests and Bland-Altman plots.
resultsHighest P% values were found with brackets in situ (49.4 ± 8.9 P%), followed by values obtained after bracket debonding (34.0 ± 7.1 P%). After masking bracket areas, plaque levels approximated those seen after debonding (29.8 ± 7.0 vs. 34.0 ± 7.1 P%; p < .001). No significant difference was observed between bracket types. Reliable plaque quantification was achieved when bracket areas were masked in both scan sets.
conclusionsIntraoral scans enable valid planimetric plaque quantification in patients with MB, especially when metallic bracket areas are masked during analysis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Digital intraoral scans, combined with plaque disclosing agents, offer a reproducible and objective method for assessing plaque levels in orthodontic patients. This approach may support individualized hygiene monitoring and patient education during fixed appliance therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.