ArticleScientific reports2026
Predicting skeletal fluorosis severity using machine learning across diverse fluoride-exposed populations in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skeletal fluorosis (SF) is a chronic metabolic bone disease resulting from long-term excessive fluoride exposure, affecting millions worldwide. Conventional diagnosis relies on radiographic evidence, which often detects the disease only at advanced stages, limiting opportunities for early intervention and prevention. A predictive model was developed to assess the severity of SF using comprehensive predictors, including demographic, environmental, and biomonitoring data, from 1,309 individuals across three major fluoride-endemic regions in China, representing coal-burning, drinking-water, and brick-tea fluoride exposure. After variable selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, five machine learning algorithms were trained and validated. Model performance was primarily evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to enhance model interpretability. The Random Forest model achieved the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.875 in the training set; 0.832 in the test set). SHAP analysis identified pain score, joint function, age, and UF concentration as the most influential predictors of SF severity. The model also captured regional differences in exposure and severity patterns across the three fluoride sources. This interpretable machine learning framework provides a robust tool for early risk screening and severity stratification of SF in high-risk populations. By enabling timely identification of individuals at risk of progression, the model serves as a foundation for targeted public health interventions and highlights the utility of data-driven methods in large-scale environmental health surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.