ArticleScientific reports2026
Zero-shot English-Assamese neural machine translation via pivot-based cross-lingual embedding alignment and transfer learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural Machine Translation (NMT) for low-resource languages such as Assamese faces significant challenges due to the scarcity of parallel corpora. To address this, we propose a novel zero-shot translation framework that leverages linguistic proximity between Assamese and Bengali, enabling English-to-Assamese translation without direct parallel data. Our approach combines a multilingual transfer learning architecture based on mBART with cross-lingual embedding alignment via Procrustes optimization, unifying English, Bengali, and Assamese into a shared semantic space. We further mitigate out-of-vocabulary (OOV) challenges through subword tokenization, embedding projection, and dynamic vocabulary expansion, while advanced language tagging mechanisms reduce off-target errors by enforcing explicit language distinctions during inference. We evaluate our framework on a curated English-Assamese dataset, achieving a BLEU score of 28.65-7.53 points higher than direct translation baselines. Human evaluations highlight significant improvements, with adequacy and fluency scores of 4.5/5 and 4.6/5, respectively, and an 8.4% error rate reduction. Ablation studies confirm the critical roles of embedding alignment and language-aware tagging, while inference speed analysis demonstrates a 26.9% improvement over baseline models. This work demonstrates that (pivot based) transfer learning and cross-lingual alignment is effective in bridging resource gaps for linguistically proximate languages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.