Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41844835›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Cognitive and motor inhibition in balance-related tasks: task-specific associations with executive and physical functions in young and older adults.

Eunyoung Kwag, Wiebren Zijlstra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eunyoung KwagInstitute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany. en.kwag@gmail.com.
Wiebren ZijlstraInstitute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates age-related differences in relations between inhibitory control in balance-related tasks (BRTs) and executive and physical functions. Correlations between effects of cognitive and motor inhibition in two BRTs and performance on general tests assessing inhibition and other executive functions, as well as associations between performance of the BRTs were explored in 26 young and 46 older adults (YA: 26 ± 4, OA: 70 ± 4 years). Multiple linear regression evaluated BRT-performance using predictors from general tests of executive and physical functions. Significant age-related differences were observed in most general tests. In YA, cognitive inhibition in the BRT correlated with reaction-time and failure-rate in Go/no-go and Stop-signal-tests, while motor inhibition showed a low non-significant correlation with stop-signal reaction-time in Stop-signal-test. These patterns were not observed in OA. In YA and OA, correlations between the BRTs were low and non-significant, and, executive functions, rather than physical functions, partly associated with BRT-performance. The differential associations of cognitive and motor inhibition in the BRTs with general inhibition tests and the lack of correlations between the BRTs supports the notion that the BRTs comprise different aspects of inhibitory control. The absence of similar results in OA may reflect compensatory processes and age-related changes in cognitive functions.

Indexed as

CognitionExecutive FunctionInhibition, PsychologicalPostural BalanceAdultAgedAgingFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung AdultBalanceCognitive controlCognitive-motor interactionCompensatory processesInhibition

Identifiers

PMID41844835
PMCPMC13000256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.