Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41844799›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Multi-model forecasting of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in Abu Dhabi: benefits of correlation-based feature augmentation.

Waad Abuouelezz, Nazar Ali, Zeyar Aung, Ahmed Altunaiji, Shaik Basheeruddin Shah, Mansour Alkatheeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Waad AbuouelezzDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Nazar AliDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE. nazar.ali@ku.ac.ae.
Zeyar AungDepartment of Computer Science, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Ahmed AltunaijiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Shaik Basheeruddin ShahDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Mansour AlkatheeriEnvironment Quality Department, Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi (EAD), Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air pollution, particularly Nitrogen Dioxide ([Formula: see text]) and ground-level ozone ([Formula: see text]), poses major risks to human health and the environment, making accurate forecasting essential for effective public health management. This paper compares several machine learning and deep learning models including Decision Trees, Random Forests, Support Vector Regression, Convolutional Neural Networks, Long Short-Term Memory networks, Prophet, and Transformers, for prediction of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] levels in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Model performance is evaluated using symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (sMAPE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) across forecasting horizons of 1 hour, 2 hours, 1 day, and 1 week. We find that Transformers yielded best results, with average sMAPE values ranging from 0.2354-0.2981 for [Formula: see text] and 0.2030-0.2719 for [Formula: see text]. Convolutional Neural Network is the second-best performer for short- and medium-forecasts, while Prophet is second-best for longer horizons. We also observe improved prediction accuracy when the inter-pollutant correlations between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are considered, particularly for 1-hour [Formula: see text] and 1- to 24-hour [Formula: see text] forecasts. These findings highlight the superiority of Transformer models and the benefits of incorporating pollutant coexistence effects in air quality forecasting.

Indexed as

Air pollution[Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]Inter-pollutant correlationMachine learningTransformer model

Identifiers

PMID41844799
PMCPMC13128865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.