ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-model forecasting of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in Abu Dhabi: benefits of correlation-based feature augmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Air pollution, particularly Nitrogen Dioxide ([Formula: see text]) and ground-level ozone ([Formula: see text]), poses major risks to human health and the environment, making accurate forecasting essential for effective public health management. This paper compares several machine learning and deep learning models including Decision Trees, Random Forests, Support Vector Regression, Convolutional Neural Networks, Long Short-Term Memory networks, Prophet, and Transformers, for prediction of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] levels in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Model performance is evaluated using symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (sMAPE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) across forecasting horizons of 1 hour, 2 hours, 1 day, and 1 week. We find that Transformers yielded best results, with average sMAPE values ranging from 0.2354-0.2981 for [Formula: see text] and 0.2030-0.2719 for [Formula: see text]. Convolutional Neural Network is the second-best performer for short- and medium-forecasts, while Prophet is second-best for longer horizons. We also observe improved prediction accuracy when the inter-pollutant correlations between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are considered, particularly for 1-hour [Formula: see text] and 1- to 24-hour [Formula: see text] forecasts. These findings highlight the superiority of Transformer models and the benefits of incorporating pollutant coexistence effects in air quality forecasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.