ArticleScientific reports2026
Value of hyperspectral data for wall to wall wetland vegetation mapping in heterogeneous landscapes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote sensing is increasingly employed today for the creation of wall-to-wall vegetation maps of protected areas. The main objective of this study was to evaluate whether it is feasible to develop a remote sensing-based wall-to-wall vegetation map of wetlands that is useful for nature conservation purposes without hyperspectral data. The research was conducted in the Narew National Park in north-eastern Poland. In 2020, three types of airborne data covering an area of 325 km2 were acquired: hyperspectral, Light Detection and Ranging data (LiDAR), and from visible and near infrared range (RGBN) imagery. At the same time, botanists collected 1,921 reference polygons for training and validating the machine learning model. Then, classifications were conducted using the CatBoost algorithm with four different scenarios created from the mentioned datasets. The results indicate that, based on hyperspectral and LiDAR data, it is possible to produce a wall-to-wall vegetation map with an overall accuracy of 0.82. When hyperspectral data are replaced by less expensive and widely accessible RGBN data, accuracy declines by 0.10; this reduction decreases to 0.09 if textural features derived from the RGBN data are additionally incorporated into the classification. In scenarios where only LiDAR data are available, vegetation classification accuracy is much lower, reaching 0.63. Comparison of the remote sensing maps with a vegetation map created through field mapping methods indicates that, irrespective of whether hyperspectral or only RGBN and LiDAR data are available, remote sensing maps contribute substantial new knowledge regarding wetland vegetation in spatially heterogeneous landscapes and are highly useful for their conservation management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.