Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41844751›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A machine learning-based classification method for SynRM faults.

V Rajini, V S Nagarajan, Mohammad Imtiyaz Gulbarga, Ayman Aljarbouh, M Jassem, Amaan Meer, C Ahamed Saleel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

V RajiniSri Siva Subramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai, India.
V S NagarajanSri Siva Subramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai, India.
Mohammad Imtiyaz GulbargaFaculty of Engineering and Informatics, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Ala-Too International University, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. imtiyaz.gulbarga@alatoo.edu.kg.
Ayman AljarbouhDepartment of Software Engineering, College of Computer Engineering and Science, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, P.O. Box 1664, Al Khobar 31952, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
M JassemTechnical Product Development and Research Operations, HVDC, Hitachi Energy Ltd, Chennai, India.
Amaan MeerRobert Bosch Global Software Ltd, Bangalore, India.
C Ahamed SaleelDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 394, Abha, 61421, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University RGP2/306/44.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synchronous reluctance motors (SynRMs) are increasingly critical in industrial and traction applications due to their high efficiency, magnet-free construction, and thermal robustness. However, fault diagnosis frameworks specifically tailored to SynRMs remain scarce, with existing literature predominantly focusing on induction or permanent-magnet machines, isolated fault scenarios, or simulation-only validations. This paper presents a comprehensive multi-fault diagnosis framework that addresses critical gaps in SynRM condition monitoring through rigorous experimental validation and reproducible methodology. Inter-turn short-circuit faults (5% severity, 12/240 turns) and inner-race bearing defects were experimentally induced on a 2.2 kW laboratory SynRM under varying load conditions (no-load, 50%, and 100% rated load), while static/dynamic eccentricity faults were modelled via ANSYS Maxwell FEA and statistically aligned with experimental distributions through noise injection and domain adaptation. Discrete Wavelet Transform (Daubechies 4, 5-level decomposition) was employed to extract time-frequency features from stator currents, yielding a 12-dimensional feature space capturing harmonic signatures from 0 Hz to 5 kHz. Eight machine-learning classifiers were evaluated under standardized protocols: stratified 80/20 train-test splitting (group-based to prevent data leakage), 5-fold cross-validation, and systematic hyperparameter optimization via Grid Search. Results demonstrate that ensemble tree-based methods significantly outperform linear models (McNemar's test, p < 0.05). Random Forest achieved 99.975% accuracy with 100% recall for inter-turn fault detection and 99.975% accuracy with 100% recall for bearing faults, prioritizing zero false negatives essential for protection relaying. For eccentricity classification, AdaBoost and XGBoost attained 100% accuracy with O(NlogN) training complexity, avoiding the prohibitive O(N

Indexed as

Fault classifierFault diagnosisMachine learningSynchronous reluctance motor

Identifiers

PMID41844751
PMCPMC13128964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.