ArticleScientific reports2026
Inflammatory, clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with depressive disorder during pregnancy in Brazilian women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Depressive disorder during pregnancy is common and may be influenced by clinical and immune factors. We conducted a cross-sectional exploratory study of 55 pregnant women receiving care at a public university-affiliated antenatal clinic in Brazil to examine whether inflammatory biomarkers, obstetric history and sociodemographic characteristics were associated with depressive disorder. Depressive disorder was defined using a validated Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale cut-off (score ≥ 13) that showed complete agreement with DSM-5-based diagnoses in this sample. Plasma levels of CXCL16, CCL27, TNF and IL-10 were measured by ELISA and compared between women with and without depressive disorder, with adjustment for multiple testing. Exploratory logistic regression models estimated the odds of depressive disorder according to obstetric and sociodemographic variables. The prevalence of depressive disorder was 27.3%. Multigravida and multiparous women showed higher odds of depressive disorder than primigravida and nulliparous women, although estimates were imprecise and should be interpreted cautiously. None of the inflammatory biomarkers differed significantly between groups after correction; for TNF, a medium mean difference was observed but did not reach statistical significance. Weak correlations between CXCL16 or CCL27 and gestational age did not remain significant after adjustment. These findings highlight the need for larger longitudinal studies to clarify how obstetric history and immune pathways relate to depressive disorder in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.