ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning analysis for enhanced prediction of heat transfer in Maxwell hybrid nanofluids with non-Fourier law and radiation effects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanofluids have emerged as promising heat transfer media due to their superior thermal performance associated to conventional fluids, yet their behavior under mutual impacts of radiation, heat source/sink, and magnetic fields remains an active area of research. In this study, movement and heat transfer characteristics of a Maxwell-based hybrid nanofluid containing carbon nanotubes are examined over a stretching/shrinking sheet with slip boundary conditions and Cattaneo–Christov heat flux. Governing nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) are reduced through similarity transformations and resolved numerically by means of MATLAB bvp4c routine. Numerical outcomes are analyzed for the effects of important parameters such as magnetic field strength, Biot number, velocity slip, and thermal radiation over velocity and temperature distributions. For the investigated parameter ranges (magnetic parameter 0.1–1.2, radiation parameter 0.3–0.9, and Biot number 0–0.8), thermal radiation and Biot number are found to enhance heat transfer rates, while increasing magnetic effects suppress the velocity field. The hybrid nanofluid consistently exhibits improved thermal performance compared to the corresponding nanofluid case. To complement numerical framework, artificial neural networks (ANNs) are implemented as surrogate predictive models. A multilayer perceptron structure qualified with Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm (LMA) is employed, with datasets from bvp4c distributed into 70% for training, 15% for validation, and 15% for testing. ANN demonstrates outstanding predictive performance, achieving mean squared error (MSE) values as low as [Formula: see text] for velocity gradients and [Formula: see text] for temperature profiles, with correlation coefficients of [Formula: see text] across all training, validation, and test subsets. These results confirm that ANN models can accurately reproduce the nonlinear boundary-layer solutions with negligible error. The combined numerical–ANN approach establishes a novel and computationally efficient framework for analyzing hybrid nanofluid flows. The outcomes highlight the strong influence of magnetic and thermal parameters on stream and heat transfer features and demonstrate ability of ANNs to serve as reliable predictive models for complex nonlinear systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.