ArticleScientific reports2026
AI-powered ultrasound radiofrequency analysis for non-invasive pediatric liver fat quantification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) affects 30–50% of obese children, yet accurate non-invasive quantification remains challenging. While magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) represents the reference standard, its limited accessibility necessitates alternative approaches. Forty pediatric patients (age 12.16 ± 2.56 years) referred for MASLD were prospectively enrolled for same-day ultrasound radiofrequency (RF) data acquisition and MRI-PDFF examination. Two artificial intelligence (AI) approaches using multiple input combinations of RF data, ultrasound-guided attenuation parameters (UGAP), and clinical parameters were developed for non-invasive pediatric liver fat quantification: radiomics-based models and deep learning models. The best radiomics model (XGBoost) and the best deep learning model (Mod-MHDNet) achieved optimal performance with multimodal inputs (R2 = 0.81 and 0.76, respectively). Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated excellent agreement with MRI-PDFF, with a mean bias of < 0.4% points for both approaches. AI analysis of ultrasound RF data enables accurate and accessible quantification of pediatric liver fat, offering a practical alternative for MASLD evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.